Evolution is the Greatest Myth in the History of Mankind
In my experience over the past decade evolution is the podium that most unbelievers stand on to shout down my beliefs in the Bible and Jesus Christ. They believe this absurd fantasy is unassailable as they shoot their venomous arrows at my sacred beliefs. They often boast, "Evolution disproves the Bible." I honestly feel pity for these willfully ignorant heathens for believing such nonsense. Evolution is the biggest fairy tale in the history of mankind.
I was debating a very smart and well-read evolutionist last night and the key to pulling down the stronghold (2 Corinthians 10:3-5) of evolution is to take them all the way back to the beginning. I asked him, "How was the universe created?"
"The creation of the universe was the result of the fundamental instability of existence and nonexistence. Spontaneous creation in this matter has been observed in quantum space. It is the tendency of reality to be chaotic."
I poignantly asked him:
“Where did the matter come from to create the universe? Time and space are finite and they did not create themselves. How did it get there? You cannot get something from nothing.”
"It was spontaneous. There was no way there could have been a "before" during which the universe could have been created. At the instance of creation time and space were incredibly unstable; more so than they are now, allowing much more to be made."
I drove my point home, never let them get away from the fundamental issue; you cannot get something from nothing. This "black matter" or whatever they want to call it did not create itself. I pressed him further and asked him, "How did this; time, space, and matter get there?"
He had no answer because the only rational explanation is God created the universe ex nihilo (Out of nothing). He asked me, “Well, how did God get there? Who created Him?” I replied, "God is an uncaused, cause. God has always been. God dwells in eternity outside of time and He had no beginning. If our finite minds could grasp the splendor of God He would not be worth worshipping. He is too big for our little minds; God is infinite, all powerful, all knowing, and a consuming fire that demands our reverence. In comparison, our minds are finite, small, and inadequate to comprehend God's glory. How is it possible for the finite to fully understand the infinite?"
“For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ,”
2 Corinthians 10:3-5.
Is evolution true? Would scientists lie about evolution similar to the way scientists lied in "Climategate?" Scientists lied and suppressed "data" about Global Warming to push their godless agenda. Would scientists do the same thing concerning evolution? Scientists are supposed to be objective and follow the evidence wherever it leads. If this is always true why did those scientists lie about Global Warming in Climategate? Is it possible scientists could lie concerning evolution in a similar manner? These are some things to think about, be honest with yourself and look at the evidence with an open mind.
"Science depends on good quality of data. It also relies on replication and sharing data. But the last couple of days have uncovered some shocking revelations. Computer hackers have obtained 160 megabytes of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England. These e-mails, which have now been confirmed as real, involved many researchers across the globe with ideologically similar advocates around the world. They were brazenly discussing the destruction and hiding of data that did not support global warming claims. The academics here also worked closely with the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change."
Q: Describe the premise and process of intelligent design?
A: The premise of intelligent design is that the evidence of science, understood impartially, points to the need for intelligence. This is shown in two particular ways. First, there is the irreducible complexity of living organisms, like the biological cell. This is best explained in the book "Darwin's Black Box" by my friend and colleague, biochemist Michael Behe. He shows the incredible complexity of each cell and the systems that are required many complex parts to work. If you are missing one part, you don't get an almost perfect system; you get no system at all. Any creative process would have to produce everything all at once. The Darwinism says that you produce one thing that has some function, and then you add another one and another one and so on until you get the complete cell. Each step is supposedly superior to the last. But irreducible complexity makes that impossible. That is the first feature.
The second feature of the living organisms is that they contain what is known as complex specific information. To explain that, just think of a book like an encyclopedia or a computer program like Windows 98. Computer programs don't write themselves; they need computer engineers. A computer program has a very complex set on instructions. Richard Dawkins, the arch Darwinist promoter and atheist, admits forthrightly that a single cell in the body has more information in it than all the volumes of the encyclopedia Britannica put together. That information is what coordinates the activities of the cell. Now, you know how impossible it would be to provide an encyclopedia by mixing letters at random until they come together in a certain way.
Neither of these things can be explained by the Darwinism theory. They don't even try to explain them; all they do is huff and puff and bluff and say, "You're not allowed to challenge our scientific fact." This dogma is not science at all. None of it has been demonstrated by experiment, which is what would have to happen for it to be truly scientific.
(Dr. Phillip E. Johnson, Decision magazine Volume 44, number 8, August 2003)
Q: If there is no evidence for evolution, why do teachers continue to propagate it in our universities and schools?
A: Most professors continue to teach evolution in the universities out of fear. This fear is that of not being tenured, of not getting research grants, of not being published, and of not being accepted by their peers. So to be accepted, to be published, to be granted research money, and to be tenured by their university, they must follow the party line, which is evolution. This is how the academic game is played.
(Dr. Phillip E. Johnson, speaking at a conference.)
John MacArthur: The Theology of Creation, Part 1.
"This most beautiful system of sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the council and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being."
Sir Isaac Newton
"If all animals and man evolved, then there were no first parents, no paradise, no fall. And if there had been no fall, then the entire historic fabric of Christianity, the story of the first sin, and the reason for atonement collapses like a house of cards."
H. G. Wells, historian and evolutionist.
John MacArthur: The End of the Universe, Part 1.
John MacArthur: The End of the Universe, Part 2.
Books For Further Study
Description: Big science has expelled smart new ideas from the classroom ... What they forgot is that every generation has its Rebel! That rebel, Ben Stein (Ferris Bueller’s Day Off) travels the world on his quest, and learns an awe-inspiring truth … that educators and scientists are being ridiculed, denied tenure and even fired – for the crime of merely believing that there might be evidence of design in nature, and that perhaps life is not just the result of accidental, random chance.
Description: Militant atheism is on the rise. In recent years Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens have produced a steady stream of best-selling books denigrating religious belief. These authors are merely the leading edge of a larger movement that includes much of the scientific community. In response, mathematician David Berlinski, himself a secular Jew, delivers a biting defense of religious thought. The Devil’s Delusion is a brilliant, incisive, and funny book that explores the limits of science and the pretensions of those who insist it is the ultimate touchstone for understanding our world.
Michael J. Behe
Description: Michael Behe, Associate Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University, argues that the most convincing evidence for design is not to be found in the stars or the fossils, but in biochemical systems. In this very readable layman's guide to biochemistry, Behe uses examples such as vision, blood-clotting, and cellular transport to demonstrate that life comprises an astonishing array of chemical machines, made up of finely calibrated, interdependent parts that defy current naturalistic explanations.
Description: Here is the book that has shaken the scientific establishment. From fossil evidence to molecular biology, Phillip E. Johnson offers a careful, reasoned evaluation of the support for Darwinism.
Description: This short book is intended for older high school and beginning college students, along with the parents, teachers, and youth workers. It explains the tricks of logic and the loaded definitions which Darwinists use to protect their theory from critical examination, and exposes the materialist philosophy that lies concealed underneath the so-called "fact" of evolution.
Description: In The Battle for the Beginning, John MacArthur explores the creation-evolution debate, and most important, walks you step by step through the Bible’s own account of the origin of the universe. Thoroughly researched, well documented, and easy to read, this new volume tackles the tough questions and equips you to face the battle being waged inside and outside the church.
John MacArthur: God: Creator, Judge, Redeemer
John MacArthur: Indications of a Young Earth
John MacArthur: The Facts About Fossils
John MacArthur: The Earth's Chronology
John MacArthur: Creation: A Second-Class Doctrine?